![]() |
![]() |
This is a discussion on Managing Increased Use of OHVs within the Public Lands Advocacy forums, part of the Regional Forums category; GAO Report to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives FEDERAL LANDS Enhanced Planning Could Assist ...
|
|||||||
| Public Lands Advocacy A new forum dedicated to information about Public Lands Access, Trail Closures and Advocacy Issues. Get involved and educate others about the good and bad in your area! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
Managing Increased Use of OHVs
GAO
Report to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives FEDERAL LANDS Enhanced Planning Could Assist Agencies in Managing Increased Use of Off-Highway Vehicles The following are excerpts from a study commissioned by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) which was conducted from 2004-2008 and dated June, 2009. The full document can be found here . . . http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09509.pdf “Over the past 5 years, OHV use has increased on federal lands and has emerged as a national issue. Federal land management agencies have only recently begun to respond to this trend by revising their plans and how they manage OHV use, but they are having to do so in an environment of constrained budgetary and staff resources and other competing management priorities. Although they reported taking a variety of actions to manage OHV use in this environment, agency field unit officials reported that they cannot sustainably manage their OHV route systems. To help provide quality OHV recreational opportunities while protecting natural and cultural resources on federal lands, we recommend that: • the Secretary of Agriculture direct the Chief of the Forest Service to identify additional strategies to achieve the agency’s goal of improving OHV management, as well as time frames for carrying out the strategies and performance measures for monitoring incremental progress; and • the Secretary of the Interior direct the Director of BLM to enhance the agency’s existing “Priorities for Recreation and Visitor Services” by establishing performance measures and time frames for carrying out its stated goals for OHV recreation. Additionally, to improve communication with the public and enhance law enforcement efforts regarding OHV use on federal lands, we recommend that the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior direct the Forest Service and BLM, respectively, to take the following actions: • enhance communication with the public about OHV trails and areas through, for example, developing user-friendly signs and maps to improve visitors’ experiences; and • examine fine amounts across various U.S. district courts to determine the range of fines for OHV-related violations and petition appropriate judicial authorities to make modifications where warranted.” If you read the entire document you will see what we are facing and how this report could likely be directly linked to the rash of Public Land closures and restrictions, The President’s leaked secret DOI “National Monument” plan and his “America’s Great Outdoors Initiative”. These proposed land grabs appear to be tied to a recently exposed giant “Omnibus” package of “One Size Fits All” legislation which seems designed to significantly reduce OHV access opportunities on OUR Public Lands. Stand-by and watch it happen or STAND UP and get involved in fighting this! And just in from the BRC’s Recreation News . . . AGO Initiative Update: BLM document on monument proposals made public http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20100817/NEWS01/8170308 Salazar says they aren't going to propose monuments where there isn't local support. So we can expect the administration will remove this monument from consideration? I'm not holding my breath... Lewistown meeting shows monument opposition mounting http://www.greatfallstribune.com/Lewistown-meeting-shows-monument-opposition-mounting Lawmaker: Monuments a matter for public http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/articles/lawmaker_monuments_a_matter_fo/ By Gary Harmon Wilderness, resource issues discussed at public "gathering" http://www.illinois-valley-news.com/archive/2010/08/18/gathering/ And the "Listening Sessions" continue. I hope you've logged onto the DOI website and weighed in... It's interesting to read the different take from the Listening Sessions in other parts of the country... Smokies doing its part to advance Great Outdoors Initiative National parks play key role in creating nature enthusiasts http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2010/aug/22/smokies-helping-lead-the-way/ And...as is to be expected... greenie's will be chiming in in praise of the AGO Initiative goals and encouraging more National Parks and Monuments... National Treasures or American Wastelands, the Choice is Ours http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philippe-cousteau/national-treasures-or-ame_b_684481.html Philippe Cousteau ________________________________________ Forest Service Planning Rule Update: Lame stream media doing their part to advance the USFS "all lands" approach to forest planning... USFS Report: 'Ecosystem Services' at Risk From Suburban Development http://www.nytimes.com/19greenwire-usfs-report-ecosystem-services-at-risk-from-sub-6173.html Private Forests Public Benefits: Download Report http://www.fs.fed.us/openspace/fote/benefits_download.html The other day the US Forest Service blasted a Planning Rule update informing the public that they've dismissed the many serious concerns over this concept of planning for state and private lands within the Forest Planning process. Doing so before the Draft Rule is out is not a good sign. More here . . . http://www.sharetrails.org/public-lands/?section=BRC_Recnews&rnid=97
__________________
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|