![]() |
![]() |
This is a discussion on The Next Obama Eligibility Case within the Off-Topic OLD forums, part of the Other category; And this one might stick.... Eligibility case finds 'standing'?...
|
|||||||
| Off-Topic OLD Discussion of anything that doesn't fit anywhere else. If it's related to motorcycles in any way, DO NOT post it here. Post it in General Discussion or a more specific forum. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
The Next Obama Eligibility Case
|
|
|||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Be honest, do a nexus search and you will find that Hussein got zero negative stories compared to the other chump. I have AA friends that still don't think his Mother was white or that his biofather was a wahabist radical Muslim! Now, how many criminals run in your circle?HMMMMM! How many times have you sat in the living room of a known, proud terrorist? Google Rezco or William Ayers!
|
|
|||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Hog wash on the race card! The question was also raised on McCain during the election. I personally think he is eligible but the fact that there seems to be zero process to prove eligibility is not good. Further as I have stated before I think the Supreme Court should take this issue up not to remove Obama but rather to set a minimum standard of evidence for future elections.
|
|
|||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Quote:
, i hope that he is a natural born US citizen. He's a smart man from the things that i read, i hope that he is doing the right thing.
|
|
||||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Quote:
http://www.fireblades.org/forums/pol...tml#post749948 The race issue is the court not wanting to hear the case or the media not talking about it. |
|
|||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: The Next Obama Eligibility Case
Quote:
Quote:
Why not put a big asterisk next to his name (Obama) and say that he was not an official president and he was not the 44th President of the United States of America? If he is not eligble, then he cannot be president. He is a Constitutional lawyer; he should know the law. He did and thought he can get away with it. Either the Constitution is the supreme law of the land or it is not; we cannot decide that it is ok in some circumstances not to enforce it. |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|